Research on the Marketization of Data Elements Empowering the Digital Development of Industrial Economy

Authors

  • Hongzhao Duan
  • Ling Wang
  • Tingting Wu
  • Jing Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/q73vfy91

Keywords:

Multi period double difference, Data element market, Digitalization of industrial economy

Abstract

As an important part of market-oriented allocation of factors, the construction of data element market is an important way to empower the digital development of industries. Scientific evaluation of its policy effects is of great significance for promoting the construction of "Digital China". This article is based on a sample of 280 prefecture level cities from 2010 to 2021, and considers the establishment of data trading platforms as an exogenous shock. A multi period double difference model is used to deeply examine the impact of market-oriented allocation of data factors on the digitalization of industrial economy. Research has found that in terms of impact, the construction of data element markets has effectively improved the level of industrial digitalization development. However, due to differences in economic development and innovation levels in different regions, the impact varies. Therefore, it is necessary to continuously leverage the role of data element market construction in enhancing the level of industrial digitalization development, improve the construction level of data trading platforms, promote the free flow of data elements, fully utilize the multiple spillover effects of data element market construction, and promote the coordinated development of industrial digitalization between regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Dai Shuangxing. Data Elements: Main Features, Driving Effects, and Development Paths [J]. Marxism and Implementation, 2020 (06).

[2] Hong Yinxing, Ren Baoping. The connotation and approach of deep integration between digital economy and real economy [J]. China Industrial Economy, 2023 (2): 5-16.

[3] He Yuchang, Wang Wei. Theoretical Explanation of Marketization of Data Elements [J]. Contemporary Economic Research, 2021 (4): 33-44.

[4] Yang Yan, Wang Li, Liao Zujun. Market allocation of data elements and regional economic development: from the perspective of data trading platforms [J]. Reform, 2022 (2): 76-87.

[5] Liu Manfeng, Yang Jie, Chen Liang. Construction of Data Element Market and Development of Urban Digital Economy [J]. Contemporary Finance and Economics, 2023 (2): 1-13.

[6] Shi Dan. The evolution of industrial development trends under the conditions of digital economy [J]. China Industrial Economy, 2022 (11): 26-42.

[7] Shi Dan, Sun Guanglin. Research on the Impact Mechanism of Big Data Development on Total Factor Productivity of Manufacturing Enterprises [J]. Finance and Trade Economics, 2022 (9): 85-100.

[8] Sheng Mingquan, Liu Yue. How Foreign Direct Investment Affects Enterprise Total Factor Productivity [J]. Modern Economic Discussion, 2021 (16).

[9] Fu Weizhong, Liu Yao. Research on the Coupling and Coordination of Industrial Digitization and High Quality Development of Manufacturing Industry: Empirical Analysis Based on the Yangtze River Delta Region [J]. East China Economic Management, 2021 (12).

[10] Chen Hanyu, Zhao Zifeng, Liu Chao. Has the construction of data element markets promoted the digital development of industries? A quasi natural experiment based on data trading platforms [J]. Macroeconomic Research, 2024 (01): 61-74.

[11] Wang Xiaodan, Shi Yutang, Liu Da. Research on the Impact of Marketized Allocation of Data Elements on the Integration of Numbers and Reality: A Quasi Natural Experiment Based on the Establishment of Data Trading Platforms [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, 2024, 39 (02) 44-58.

Downloads

Published

30-05-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Duan, H., Wang, L., Wu, T., & Wang, J. (2025). Research on the Marketization of Data Elements Empowering the Digital Development of Industrial Economy. International Journal of Finance and Investment, 3(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.54097/q73vfy91